Support of Anglo Irish Bank Strains Ireland
August 31, 2010 International Herald Tribune by By LANDON THOMAS Jr.
DUBLIN — Can one bank bring down a country?
Anglo Irish Bank, the midsize Irish lender whose profligacy has come to symbolize the excesses of the real estate bubble here, is doing its best to find out.
No other country aside from Iceland suffered a banking bust as severe as Ireland’s during the financial crisis. Ireland was also the country that took the most direct route in tackling the problem, by recognizing upfront the bad loans of its devastated banks and transferring them to government ledgers.
Both the United States and Britain avoided such a move by taking stakes in their troubled banks and, in the case of Britain, insuring their worst-performing loans.
Now the Irish government’s strategy is being called into question as its credit rating suffers and its borrowing costs resume their upward trajectory. Ireland’s struggle to cope with its mounting bank losses could well be a harbinger for other parts of Europe and for the United States as stuttering economic growth and stagnant housing markets put further strain on bank balance sheets.
Anglo Irish, which on Tuesday reported a first-half loss of 8.2 billion euros ($10.4 billion) also said the government had injected an additional 8 billion euros ($10.16 billion) into the bank, bringing total aid so far to 22 billion euros.
Mike Aynsley, the bank’s chief executive, said Tuesday that he expected the government’s total investment in the bank to be about 25 billion euros ($31.75 billion). He added that commercial property, the bank’s core lending market, which is already down 60 percent, had not yet reached bottom.
“Anytime you see a correction like that, you will see carnage,” he said. “But we think that the 25 billion euros will be largely sufficient.”
Analysts here expect the bank’s defunct loans to hit 35 billion euros, or about 22 percent of Ireland’s gross domestic product — a hard-to-believe figure, given that Anglo Irish at its peak was just the third-largest bank in Ireland. In 2008, total Irish bank lending to households and nonfinancial companies was more than 200 percent of G.D.P. — by far the highest such ratio in the euro zone.
The growing losses at Anglo Irish and other Irish banks are expected to cost the government 80 billion to 90 billion euros, according to Standard & Poor’s, which says 35 billion euros will be needed for Anglo Irish — a figure the government and Mr. Aynsley say is significantly overstated.
The ratings agency said that the country’s banking liabilities would push its debt-to-G.D.P. ratio to 113 percent in 2012, higher than Spain’s and Belgium’s and approaching the levels of countries like Italy and Greece.
Last week, S.& P. downgraded Ireland’s credit rating to AA-minus from AA, a change that has driven the already steep yield, or risk premium, on 10-year Irish government bonds to new highs of 5.5 percentage points — second in the euro zone only to Greece’s 11 percentage points.
“This is out of control and the markets see it now,” said Peter Mathews, an independent banking and real estate consultant here, who for the last year has been waging a furious one-man crusade, warning of Anglo Irish’s escalating losses and calling for the bank to be liquidated — with bond holders, not the Irish taxpayer, taking the hit.
“How bad can it get?” Mr. Mathews said. “Irish debt paper could stop being tradable, and the outside agencies like the European Union and the International Monetary Fundmight have to come in.”
Mr. Mathews’s view in this regard represents an extreme. Economists at the Economic and Social Research Institute, an independent organization here, cite the government’s cash cushion of about 40 billion euros — much of it set aside at the outset of the crisis — as a crucial safety net that separates Ireland from Greece.
The government, for its part, argues that Ireland’s approach to bad loans — taking them off the balance sheets of the banks and then assuming responsibility for them — was correct.
“Our banks would have probably assumed zombie-like status if we had delayed in recognizing these impairments,” said John Corrigan, the chief executive of the country’s debt management agency. Part of his organization is the National Asset Management Agency, the government group that has spent the year buying bad loans from banks.
“The downgrade was deeply disappointing to us, but we still have a better credit rating than Italy and Portugal,” he said. And international bond investors, who own about 85 percent of the government’s debt, continued to buy its paper, he said.
Will the Anglo Irish loans lead to a buyers’ strike by investors?
“No,” said Mr. Corrigan with a vigorous shake of his head. “We have enough liquidity to take us well into the second quarter next year.”
While Mr. Mathews and the government may be opposed on how to handle the problem, they agree on how absurd the lending practices at Anglo Irish were.
Even by the standards of the global banking collapse, Anglo Irish stood out. From a loan book of about 75 billion euros when the government took over in 2009, Anglo Irish says that it has only about 12 billion euros in loans that it classifies as performing. The bank is expected to transfer 36 billion euros in troubled loans to the asset management agency — about half its existing loans.
“It was mad — a credit cocaine run,” said Mr. Mathews, his voice rising in frustration.
He was standing outside a gravel-strewn 25-acre plot, flanked by a housing project and the rough Dublin docklands. In 2006, as Ireland’s real estate frenzy reached its peak, a group of developers paid 412 million euros ($523.2 million) for this industrial site, backed by a 300 million euro loan from Anglo Irish.
Mr. Mathews, a former banker who now advises real estate developers, estimates that the land may now be worth only 20 million euros — if it can be sold at all.
It is not just in Ireland that the bank’s aggressive lending stood out. Through its private client division in Boston, Anglo Irish was one of the most wildly eager property lenders in the United States. It financed the construction of skyscrapers in Chicago and shopping centers in Boston, not to mention lending more than $500 million to a series of troubled and in some cases failed real estate projects in New York.
Most notorious of those was a top-of-the-market, $393 million mortgage in 2007 to the Apthorp, a luxury apartment building in New York that has been home to celebrities like the writer Nora Ephron and the actor Al Pacino.
After a series of legal disputes, the building’s developers are struggling to convert the complex into an upscale condominium. Anglo Irish recently said that rents on the units would be paid directly to the bank — an indication, analysts say, that the project’s developers may be facing further financing strains.
“It was just the height of hubris,” Mr. Mathews said as he drove away from the deserted development site in Dublin. “And why should Citizen Joe and Mary pick up the tab for this when it was the bondholders that had all the aces in their hand?”
Misleading Reporting and Mounting Loan Losses at the Irish Banks
This article originally appeared in Friday August 20th Irish Examiner on page 13 (Analysis) under the headline “Time to rethink bank rescue plan“.
In the last fortnight AIB and Bank of Ireland (BoI) respectively reported their half year results. Both sets of accounts were untruthful. In the case of AIB, their reported loan losses were under-stated by €500m (€.5bn). In the case of BoI their reported loan losses were under-stated by €300m (€.3bn). This is not acceptable.
Also in recent days we were informed that Anglo’s loan losses had risen from the €22bn admitted to an Oireachtas Committee on 16th June 2010, to a revised figure of €24.35bn. Again, this is misleading and unacceptable.
It would be far more honest and truthful of the Minister to acknowledge that embedded irrecoverable loan losses in Anglo are at least €32bn (not the admitted €24.35bn) and will rise to not less than €36bn. Embedded irrecoverable loan losses in Irish Nationwide Building Society (INBS) are at least €4bn (not the admitted €3.2bn) and will rise to not less than €6bn. Fundamentally, that’s why both Anglo and INBS should be closed down. Further details in relation to close-down consequences (they have been considered and presented to an Oireachtas Committee) are not discussed here.
In relation to the 3 viable banks, AIB, BoI and EBS,…. AIB needs €10bn (not the stated €7.4bn before year-end) re-capitalisation now, to cover its Property Development and Investment loan losses. BoI needs €6.5bn (not the stated €3.65bn) re-capitalisation now, to cover its Property Development and Investment loan losses. EBS needs €1bn in re-cap. That’s a total immediate re-cap requirement of €17.5bn for the 3 viable banks.
These 3 banks should be re-capped at this level without delay and temporarily nationalised…. for the sake of the country. The absurd situation at present is that these 3 banks couldn’t even open for business without the State’s Blanket Liabilities guarantee. And yet the State has had negligible influence on these 3 institutions since September 2008! Astonishing!
What should, of course, now happen (it should have happened soon after the Blanket guarantee was put in place) is that Bondholders in the 3 institutions should be directed by the State to contribute to this re-cap at a level of say €6.5bn in appropriate proportions. [As part of this restructuring, the State might offer bondholders a small (token) debt for equity swap]. The State would invest the balance of €11bn by way of a State Banks Re-Cap Bond issue (zero coupon).
The State’s earlier investments (€3.5bn each to AIB and BoI) plus the “fresh” €11bn, making a total of €18bn, would be more than recovered with a profit / gain in 5 years time by sale of the investments in the 3 institutions. An undemanding €3.5bn – €4bn level of normal maintainable annual profits for the combined 3 institutions multiplied by a 6.5 times Price / Earnings (P/E) multiple gives a valuation range of €22.75bn – €26bn. All three viable banks would thus be transparently and successfully nationalised temporarily (5 years) for the purposes of their full rehabilitation / re-booting.
NAMA loans transfers should be reversed (fundamentally this is merely accounting book entries). Recoveries Divisions in the Banks would be tasked with loans recoveries / restructurings / work-outs etc, at the re-cap fully written-down amounts. This Banking Sector Re-Capitalisation Action Plan would, of course, entail full clean-outs of the bank boards and major senior management changes plus some infusions of new management with excellent leadership temperaments. Perhaps senior NAMA personnel can be re-deployed into the Banks Recoveries Divisions to provide fresh operational leadership.
All of this could be put in place very speedily (weeks). This type of robust, transparent re-capitalisation of the Banking Sector is what is needed for the hugely necessary asset price and rental levels corrections to continue in order to repair our economy. Unless this happens there will be no recovery in the overall real economy, the economy that produces, distributes and exports goods and services and supports jobs and employment.
Peter Mathews
19th August 2010
Righting the NAMA Wrongs
My analysis piece in Friday’s (Aug 6th) Irish Examiner ANALYSIS, page 13, can be read by clicking on the link below:
Minister’s reply on guarantee
Madam, – In response to Minister for Finance Brian Lenihan (July 31st), I would say either he doesn’t understand matters or else he’s being deliberately misleading.
This is the kind of confused thinking and manipulative talking that’s been promoted since he and the Government chose to introduce the far too extensive, far too long-lasting two-year (now further extended) blanket bank guarantee scheme and the hugely costly Nama Project.
Mr Lenihan asserts that “Merrill Lynch also recommended a blanket guarantee of Anglo Irish Bank, including, incidentally, subordinated debt”. This statement is simply untrue. This can be checked by re-reading carefully all the notes, draft preliminary analysis, memos and records presented to the Oireachtas Public Accounts Committee in relation to Merrill Lynch’s advice. In regard to the report to Minister Lenihan by the Governor of the Central Bank on The Irish Banking Crisis – Regulatory and Financial Stability Policy 2003-2008, the conclusions are clearly set out on pages 134–136. In the matter of the guarantee, nowhere in the conclusions, does the quotation “it is hard to argue . . . in the absence of decisive action”, cited by Mr Lenihan, appear.
It does appear that Mr Lenihan has made an inductive reasoning mistake which can easily happen, such as confirming that the sun rose today because a cock crowed at dawn!
Mr Lenihan concludes “I agree with Mr O’Toole that governments should be sceptical. But they most assuredly should not be reckless.” Of course governments shouldn’t be reckless. But his Government had been notably recklessly complacent for years leading up to the crisis. If they hadn’t been so recklessly complacent for so long, the emergence of the full-blown credit bubble banking crisis and the ensuing panic would have been avoided.
It was such reckless complacency, the dereliction from duty by the Government and the supervisory and regulatory bodies to maintain regulatory and financial stability policy, that led to the September 29th panic and the sub-optimal decision to introduce the blanket guarantee for all the banks.
That panic decision, while understandable (to use Prof Honohan’s word) was not excusable. That’s the point, but Mr Lenihan has missed it entirely. – Yours, etc,
PETER MATHEWS,
The Rise,
Mount Merrion, Co Dublin.
Anglo’s paper profit
An elaboration on NAMAWineLake’s point 4 in the previous article:
Anglo had on its Balance Sheet euro 2.4bn “face value” (i.e. euro 2.4bn was the nominal value of bonds originally issued meaning that when the bonds were originally issued Anglo raised euro 2.4bn cash and at the same time entered into the obligation to those bondholders to pay back those bonds in full at the bonds’ redemption date, that is, at the end of the term of the Bonds.
So, after original issue of these bonds, Anglo was carrying the liability on these bonds (i.e. euro 2.4bn) on its balance sheet. Now, because Anglo is now a totally collapsed bank seen to be a basket case Bank, which made loans that will never be collected in full, all investors, from shareholders to bondholders are very well aware that they will never get their money back because ther just arren’t enough assets on Anglo’s balance sheet which can be sold or realised to raise the cash to pay them back.
Thus, the Bondholders know that essentially the Anglo Bonds they hold are worthless! But because of the confusion and also because the State Guarantee (which expires at end Spt this year) gives the “false” impression that bondholders should be fully covered by the guarantee, the Management of Anglo offered to the bondholders to buy back from them (the bondholders) their nominal/face value bonds totalling euro 2.4bn for euro 600m which is euro 1.8bn less than the face value euro 2.4bn.
And now Anglo Management are trying to play up the absurd notion that they have thus been successful in achieving a Profit of euro 1.8bn on what they called a Liabilities Management Exercise Event!!
What I’m saying is that the truth of the matter is that the Bondholders should congratulate themselves that before the expiry of the guarantee, they were able to sell back to Anglo their worthless bonds with a face value of euro 2.4bn for euro 600m cash! If, in the true and best interests of the taxpayer, the correct decision which is to close Anglo, was announced, then the euro 2.4bn bondholders after Sept this year would get nothing clearly demonstrating how Ango’s board and managment has stupidly missed out on saving the taxpayer a further euro 600m, which instead was stupidly paid out to the euro 2.4bn bondholders.
Response to NAMAWineLake blog
see post Banker Mathews at the Oireachtas again
The blog at the link above was emailed to me and I’ve responded below:
Dear Namawinelake,
Your opening comments are definitely a little chilly, so I’m putting on my mental “jumper” to take away the chill!
Let’s consider the following:-
It’s becoming clearer in every forum where Deputy Frank Fahey makes remarks about the Banking Crisis and NAMA, that his difficiculties in understanding the concepts and operational characteristics surrounding NAMA increase his frustrations, thus inducing him to making generalised, banal, unfounded, unsupported comments which he repeats and repeats and repeats, as if believing that, by constant repetition, they become true e.g. NAMA is the ONLY solution to the Banking Crisis…So he keeps repeating his unsupported ARTICLES OF FAITH always protesting that the OECD, the IMF, the ECB (yesterday the ESB! sic!), and the EU say so and that makes them so!!
Oireachtas Joint Committee on Finance and the Public Service
July 21st 2010
Oral presentation to Dáil Joint Committee
Chairman: I welcome Mr. Peter Mathews. He will make opening remarks which will be followed by a question and answer session. I request members to be concise and to the point in their questions as we must finish around 3 p.m. We do not have much time. I request everyone to switch off their mobile telephones. I draw everyone’s attention to the fact that members of the committee have absolute privilege but that privilege does not apply to witnesses appearing before the committee. The committee cannot guarantee any level of privilege to witnesses appearing before it. Further, under the salient rulings of the Chair, members should not comment on, criticise or make charges against a person outside the House or an official by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable. I invite Mr. Mathews to make his presentation. Read more…
History Repeating: Moral Hazard and the Munster Bank
Moral Hazard and quasi-central banking:
Should the Munster Bank have been saved?
Cormac O Grada
No event in Dublin in recent years, except the
Phoenix Park murders, has caused such a sensation
A fascinating insight into the failure of the Munster Bank in July 1885.
http://irserver.ucd.ie/dspace/bitstream/10197/441/3/ogradac_bookchap_pub_068.pdf

Recent Comments