About Peter

Peter Mathews

Peter Mathews

Peter Mathews was educated at Gonzaga College and UCD Dublin where he obtained a B. Comm. and Executive M.B.A.  He is a qualified Chartered Accountant with extensive experience in Audit, Taxation and Consultancy with Coopers and Lybrand (now PwC) Dublin in the 1970’s.  In 1979 he joined ICC Bank in Dublin and managed the Enterprise Development, Hi Tech and FDI Lending Sections of the Bank.  In 1985 he was appointed to develop and manage the Property Development, Construction and Investment Lending Section, a new specialist area of lending for the Bank.  Throughout the 1980’s and 1990’s the Property Section made a significantly solid contribution to the Bank’s overall lending activities. Peter provided carefully appraised Term Loan facilities and finance as well as Performance Bond underwriting facilities to hundreds of Builders, Developers and Property Investors in Ireland and the UK during the 1980’s and 1990’s. He was commended by the Bank for outstanding work on a special assignment in the area of non-performing loans, loans work-outs, restructurings and recoveries achieving substantial write-backs to profit for ICC Bank plc during the1980’s.  In 1999 he set up an independent Banking – Property and Finance – Consultancy practice in Dublin, consulting and brokering property related deals (mainly disposals in period post 2004), and advising in Zoning and Planning matters, for clients including a Public Body, property investors, family landowners, developers and construction groups.  Post 2004, in an over-heated property market, he concentrated on advising and assisting clients to dispose of land and property.

In 2001 Peter was appointed General Director and Expert Consultant to Lietuvos Infrastrukturos Pletros Fondas [LIPF], an equity start-up Property Development Fund Project in Lithuania funded jointly by the Lithuanian government and the EU under the EU Phare Programme. He head-hunted, hired and trained a small team of highly qualified Lithuanian professionals who quickly became expert in conservative property financing methods and fully conversant with all the techniques of Property development and investment appraisal used in the established property markets around the world.  LIPF now has solidly based expertise in making “mezzanine” investments in commercial developments throughout Lithuania and includes among its clients BNTP Baltic Real Estate Developments, a leading commercial property developer based in Klaipeda.   Peter’s LIPF contract was completed in 2002.

Since 2002, Peter was involved in several significant land deals, property development deals and investment transactions mainly in Dublin and London. He also advises on City and County Development Plan Zoning matters with noted success. He maintains close business contact with Lithuania and is a frequent business visitor to the capital, Vilnius.  He was instrumental in finding excellent premises in Vilnius for the Irish Embassy which was officially opened in summer 2006.

In addition to Property and Finance Consulting, from May 2004 up to his resignation, for prudential reasons, in May 2008, Peter was a director of an Irish Incorporated and Irish resident Financial Assets Holding Company, sponsored by KBC Bank, with assets of US $5.0 billion and alternate director of other companies. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Ireland, has served on the Main Committee of the Leinster Society of Chartered Accountants and chaired several of the Society’s sub-Committees. He is also a member of the Irish Taxation Institute.  He is a former President of the Gonzaga Past Pupils Union (1990-91), served on the Board of St. Mary’s Primary N.S. Belmont Avenue, Donnybrook, and has a wide range of sports interests including Tennis, Golf, swimming and Rugby.  He is married to Susan and they have 4 children James (26), John (25), David (21) and Maria (18).

  1. ger o’toole
    November 10, 2009 at 3:08 pm | #1

    I was actively involved in the property market as an estate agent from 1997 up to when I sold on my business at end 2008.Being involved in the housing market on a daily basis I witnessed the enormous hike in prices and was amazed as to how people could afford to continue purchasing property.
    Several parties are and have been blamed for the increase in prices, but personally when the old rule of thumb of 2.5 times one salary plus once the second salary, this changed to 3.75 times the combined salaries, suddenly purchasers cuold afford to pay almost twice their original budget for a house,without any increase in salary. Now this ,I feel was a huge contributory factor, then 90% loan to value changed to 92% ltv, and in many cases 95% and 100%.So, with no other angles left, is it surprising that wev’e ended up where we are now.
    In Oct 2008 I put together a proposal to bring stability to the housing crises, I called it the re-assurance scheme and submitted it to the board of Property Partners of which I was a member of at the time, and also to the lending section of Bank of Ireland via my local regional lending manager, but the response from both was non interest.
    Without going into too much detail what I proposed was for those cproposing to purchase a house, that an amount of 20% of the purchase price would be held in trust by a bank/solicitor as stakeholder, and using a recognised house price index,if the value of the property fell over a period of 3 years after purchase, then the purchaser would be refunded that amount.Certain conditions would apply but in principle it gave the purchaser the re-assurance they needed in a volatile market.
    I am delighted to see that Ulster Bank have now a product in the marketplace which provides this re-assurance up to 15% and for a 5yr period, i’m sure certain conditions apply.This i feel is a step in the right direction, and I believe the solution to all problems start at the bottom,not at the top.
    I believe peter Mathews has put a case togegter based on REAL values,hard facts as to why Nama will not benefit the average consumer,actually for generations to come we may be paying for this grave error of judgement.
    I believe i have an alternative solution to the nama proposal which woul directly and immediately benefit the people on the ground(the mortgagee), would be much easier to calculate ,with minimal % error and would have the banking system back in business again, without any strain on the people on the ground.
    I will first seel to submit this proposal to Mr Mathews privately for his expert opinion.

  1. November 3, 2009 at 11:14 pm | #1
  2. November 6, 2009 at 12:16 am | #2
  3. January 13, 2010 at 11:39 pm | #3