Archive

Author Archive

Misleading Reporting and Mounting Loan Losses at the Irish Banks

This article originally appeared in Friday August 20th Irish Examiner on page 13 (Analysis) under the headline “Time to rethink bank rescue plan“.

In the last fortnight AIB and Bank of Ireland (BoI) respectively reported their half year results.  Both sets of accounts were untruthful.  In the case of AIB, their reported loan losses were under-stated by €500m (€.5bn).   In the case of BoI their reported loan losses were under-stated by €300m (€.3bn).  This is not acceptable.

Also in recent days we were informed that Anglo’s loan losses had risen from the €22bn admitted to an Oireachtas Committee on 16th June 2010, to a revised figure of €24.35bn.  Again, this is misleading and unacceptable.

It would be far more honest and truthful of the Minister to acknowledge that embedded irrecoverable loan losses in Anglo are at least €32bn (not the admitted €24.35bn) and will rise to not less than €36bn. Embedded irrecoverable loan losses in Irish Nationwide Building Society (INBS) are at least €4bn (not the admitted €3.2bn) and will rise to not less than €6bn.  Fundamentally, that’s why both Anglo and INBS should be closed down. Further details in relation to close-down consequences (they have been considered and presented to an Oireachtas Committee) are not discussed here.

In relation to the 3 viable banks, AIB, BoI and EBS,…. AIB needs €10bn (not the stated €7.4bn before year-end) re-capitalisation now, to cover its Property Development and Investment loan losses. BoI needs €6.5bn (not the stated €3.65bn) re-capitalisation now, to cover its Property Development and Investment loan losses.  EBS needs €1bn in re-cap. That’s a total immediate re-cap requirement of €17.5bn for the 3 viable banks.

These 3 banks should be re-capped at this level without delay and temporarily nationalised…. for the sake of the country. The absurd situation at present is that these 3 banks couldn’t even open for business without the State’s Blanket Liabilities guarantee. And yet the State has had negligible influence on these 3 institutions since September 2008! Astonishing!

What should, of course, now happen (it should have happened soon after the Blanket guarantee was put in place) is that Bondholders in the 3 institutions should be directed by the State to contribute to this re-cap at a level of say €6.5bn in appropriate proportions. [As part of this restructuring, the State might offer bondholders a small (token) debt for equity swap]. The State would invest the balance of €11bn by way of a State Banks Re-Cap Bond issue (zero coupon).

The State’s earlier investments (€3.5bn each to AIB and BoI) plus the “fresh” €11bn, making a total of €18bn, would be more than recovered with a profit / gain in 5 years time by sale of the investments in the 3 institutions. An undemanding €3.5bn – €4bn level of normal maintainable annual profits for the combined 3 institutions multiplied by a 6.5 times Price / Earnings (P/E) multiple gives a valuation range of €22.75bn – €26bn. All three viable banks would thus be transparently and successfully nationalised temporarily (5 years) for the purposes of their full rehabilitation / re-booting.

NAMA loans transfers should be reversed (fundamentally this is merely accounting book entries). Recoveries Divisions in the Banks would be tasked with loans recoveries / restructurings / work-outs etc, at the re-cap fully written-down amounts. This Banking Sector Re-Capitalisation Action Plan would, of course, entail full clean-outs of the bank boards and major senior management changes plus some infusions of new management with excellent leadership temperaments. Perhaps senior NAMA personnel can be re-deployed into the Banks Recoveries Divisions to provide fresh operational leadership.

All of this could be put in place very speedily (weeks). This type of robust, transparent re-capitalisation of the Banking Sector is what is needed for the hugely necessary asset price and rental levels corrections to continue in order to repair our economy. Unless this happens there will be no recovery in the overall real economy, the economy that produces, distributes and exports goods and services and supports jobs and employment.

Peter Mathews

19th August 2010

Categories: Opinion

Abandon every hope, ye who enter here

November 13, 2009 Richard S O'Rourke 1 comment

Reported today in the Irish Times:

The Minister for Finance this morning said he was not contemplating failure in the operation of the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) following the passing of legislation to create it…

The Bill passed its final stage in the Dáil yesterday by 81 votes to 62.

Read more…

The NAMA Bonanza – boNAMzA?

November 8, 2009 Richard S O'Rourke 4 comments

Writing my last post and thinking about Deputy McGrath’s political speak raised a couple of questions in my mind about the NAMA business plan and so I’ve gone back, yet again, to look at the numbers. I wanted to study closer the argument about the value of the underlying assets and their ability to cover the NAMA loans.

Read more…

Categories: NAMA, Opinion Tags:

None so blind as they that won’t see

November 4, 2009 Richard S O'Rourke 5 comments

Lady S. Not at all; but, you know, there’s none so blind as they that won’t see.
Jonathan Swift (1667-1745, Dublin) A Tale of a Tub and Other Satires (1704)

For those of you who watched RTE’s Prime Time last night you will have seen what happens when a politician meets a banker. If you’d like to hear what happens when a banker meets a banker listen here. I’m reminded of Fiona Looney’s reply to Vincent Browne on his TV3 show last month when asked what she thought of NAMA: “Oh it’s all very honours, isn’t it?”

Read more…

Categories: NAMA, Opinion

Dan Boyle’s Seanad Speech on NAMA

November 1, 2009 Richard S O'Rourke 2 comments
Speech on National Asset Management Agency Business Plan – Seanad Éireann – October 29th, 2009
This debate is something of a cart before the horse exercise in that the National Asset Management Agency Bill will not come to this House until it has finished its passage through the other House, but it is useful in its own right in the sense that the business plan is now part of public debate and this House is only right and proper to address it and those ongoing concerns.

Another Wild Goose (chase)

October 30, 2009 Richard S O'Rourke 1 comment

I’m writing this post from somewhere on the Irish Sea between Dublin and Holyhead.

For fear of doing a Declan Ganley on it, I won’t say it’s my last. But as I said to the taxi driver this morning as he dropped me to the ferry terminal, I’m looking forward to not thinking about NAMA for a while. Unfortunately, I’m not expecting a limo to be waiting for me when I arrive.

I met Peter Mathews for the first time just this day four weeks ago, as the country went to the polls to vote on Lisbon. We had been invited to participate in a panel of experts on our objections to NAMA. It’s funny how such chance encounters can change your plans. Peter has been very generous with his time and helped me get up the learning curve on the technicalities of our banking crisis. My head now understood what my gut was telling me. And in what might best be described as a Quixotic exercise, I did what I could to help Peter get his message out there.

Read more…

Categories: Opinion

Leviathan indeed!

October 29, 2009 Richard S O'Rourke 9 comments

The anger at last night’s political cabaret in Temple Bar, Leviathan, was palpable. And with my partiality clearly stated, the defenders of NAMA did not hold themselves to account well. The evening got off to an entertaining start, with the best of political satire as only the Irish know how, all resonating with the opinion that NAMA is closer to criminal theft than the contrary.

Read more…

NAMA – An Exercise in Obfuscation

In his public lecture in the RDS last week, Banking Expert, Peter Mathews, holds up a copy of the NAMA Bill and its Supplementary Information and highlights the lack of an overview as listed in the Table of Contents as occurring in ‘Section 5 Covered Institutions – An Overview’ on page 33.

Peter has prepared the kind of overview that our legislators should be looking at before they consider supporting the NAMA Bill. It makes for frightening reading.

PBM whats going into nama

What's going into NAMA

To see all the graphs: download

Categories: Opinion

Mathews debates at Leviathan – Oct 28th

from leviathan.ie:

Leviathan Special: “NAMA: The Only Show in Town or Criminal Theft?

The Government has proposed a National Assets Management Agency as a solution to the banking crisis. Its supporters describe it as “the only show in town” but increasing numbers of critics are calling it the biggest theft ever perpetrated on the Irish taxpayer.

On Wednesday October 28th, David McWilliams hosts a panel including Green Party finance spokesperson Senator Dan Boyle; Frank Fahey TD, member of the Oireachtas Select Committee on Finance and the Public Service; banking expert Peter Matthews; and Margaret E. Ward of The Irish Times to explain the plan and help the audience separate the fact from the fiction.

Also featuring satire from Paddy Cullivan, The Emergency: Live and a new film from Doris/Magee.

Tickets available now at €17.50 (including booking fee) at Tickets.ie

Categories: Event, NAMA Tags: ,

Positive feedback on last night’s event

October 22, 2009 Richard S O'Rourke 2 comments

Karl Whelan kindly gave our event last night a plug on the Irish Economy blog and there are plenty of comments there from people who attended the event.

Thanks again to those who ventured out last night.

Categories: Event, NAMA